From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter J Braam <Peter.Braam@Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:23:52 +0100
Subject: [Lustre-devel] WBC architecture page.
In-Reply-To: <18271.32703.427325.914760@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
References: <18271.32703.427325.914760@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Message-ID: <4781EFA8.2070104@sun.com>
List-Id: <lustre-devel-lustre.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org

Is it possible to see a proxy cluster of servers as a more general case
(CMD introduces distributed logs)?  That might be beneficial to end up
with one reintegration mechanism.

The page is very good, as I have said before I think.

-peter-

Nikita Danilov wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> can you take a look at the updated WBC architecture page
> (http://arch.lustre.org/index.php?title=Write_Back_Cache) and tell me
> what is wrong/missing?
>
> Nikita.
>