All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] KVM kernel/userspace TLB interface
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:03:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4783829F.5070902@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1199751688.5741.40.camel@basalt>

Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>       * Have a per-core interface, e.g. KVM_440_SET_TLB_ENTRY and
>         KVM_e500_SET_TLB_ENTRY. These would communicate via completely
>         different structures. For example, the 440 structure would look
>         something like { index, TID, word 0, word 1, word 2 }. We'd
>         probably want to sanity check each ioctl to make sure it matches
>         the vcpu type. Not only that, but we would need core-specific
>         code in userspace to actually make the call.
>       * Try to abstract it so that we have a higher-level "map this"
>         interface. This could look something like { virtual addr, real
>         addr, size, flags }. It's up to core-specific code to select in
>         which TLB to create the mapping, which entry to clobber,
>         interpret the meaning of "flags", etc. I guess the big downside
>         here is that if we want to dump guest state for debugging
>         purposes we'd still need the core-specific interface.
>
> We could also try supporting both #2 and #3, so that "generic" code like
> qemu could use the abstracted (and shared) "map this" call, while tools
> with more specific needs could still get at the underlying details. I
> guess #1 and #3 is like the normal userspace/kernel interface, where you
> don't ordinarily need to specify register details, but the ptrace
> interface is available when needed.
>   

An unabstracted interface is needed for save/restore/migrate, which may 
or may not be important for your target.  I do recommend having getters 
and setters for all architectural state.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
kvm-ppc-devel mailing list
kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-ppc-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-01-08 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-08  0:21 [kvm-ppc-devel] KVM kernel/userspace TLB interface Hollis Blanchard
2008-01-08  7:12 ` Zhang Wei
2008-01-08 14:03 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-01-22 13:25 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2008-01-23 13:38 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2008-01-23 21:05 ` Hollis Blanchard
2008-01-24  7:23 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2008-01-24  7:37 ` Hollis Blanchard
2008-01-24  7:58 ` Zhang Wei
2008-01-24  8:01 ` Zhang Wei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4783829F.5070902@qumranet.com \
    --to=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.