From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/27] Update modules' descriptions
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:54:35 +0100
Message-ID: <47839CBB.60809@trash.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801022037090.14900@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801022130450.14900@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr> <47839BC2.8060703@trash.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801081654550.3032@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:63301 "EHLO
	stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755394AbYAHP6c (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:58:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801081654550.3032@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org>

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jan 8 2008 16:50, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> I think the reference to iptables is actually more useful
>> than just netfilter. Could you resend after doing global
>> search and replace of Netfilter: with ip_tables/ip6_tables
>> etc.?
>>
> 
> Ok! Perhaps Xtables, because that's what it actually is?

The user-visiable part is ip_tables/ip6_tables, but both
are fine with me.