From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JCHdO-00073w-Qh for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:49:03 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Jan 2008 16:42:00 -0000 Received: from e178115083.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO [192.168.4.101]) [85.178.115.83] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 08 Jan 2008 17:42:00 +0100 X-Authenticated: #17532834 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/UDioUl3PU2gqslziH+jbDVBGcEUB7HSyIZ/wj9A ti2ROMlEl+RtOm Message-ID: <4783A7D7.4020206@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:41:59 +0100 From: Robert Schuster User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <47836C9B.3000407@gmx.net> <200801081527.09859.zecke@selfish.org> In-Reply-To: <200801081527.09859.zecke@selfish.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: RFC: add osso version of libtool and libatk X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:49:03 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 3822 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB3C2852E186727E230D5F435" --------------enigB3C2852E186727E230D5F435 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I can live with the plain versions, too. For libtool I re-added 1.5.6 as discussed on IRC. I will prepare a similar patch for atk. Holger Freyther schrieb: > On Tuesday 08 January 2008 13:29:15 Robert Schuster wrote: >> Hi, >> on IRC it was suggested to put this on the mailing list. >=20 > Hey, > I don't like adding vendor hacked versions of standard software at all.= I see=20 > the requirement you are facing but adding a Nokia hacked version is not= the=20 > right way to do it. >=20 > What are the differences you see? Can you extract the patch that is doi= ng=20 > that? Is that patch a good idea and can be applied to our version of li= btool? >=20 >=20 > kind regards > z. >=20 >=20 > PS: I care more for libtool than atk+ (did they break API/ABI compabili= ty on=20 > it?)=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >=20 --------------enigB3C2852E186727E230D5F435 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHg6fXG9cfwmwwEtoRCCvuAKCHHxR5zV2BbGtvyMtdB8durGl99gCdH4XE eaFkuhn4Lty2tgSYbEQCOmo= =Xlnl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB3C2852E186727E230D5F435--