From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Top 10 kernel oopses for the week ending January 5th, 2008
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:05:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4783C95C.7050303@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0801081025470.3148@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> the database has the information so it's just a matter of slightly different
>> php code ;)
>> Before I do that... do you want the BUG's separate, part of the warnings or
>> part of the oopses?
>> (I rather make this change once ;)
>
> I'd like them all separate, they tend to be very different and contain
> different information.
>
> Put the warnings last, as the least important. Oopses at the top, since
> they tend to be the ones that are less expected.
ok done; I had to fizzle a bit because some things aren't *exactly* a BUG() statement
but I track them anyway (things like the "sleeping in invalid context" check), so I
had to somewhat arbitrarily assign categories for those. I might fine tune these over time
some; if you or someone else sees problems with categorization please let me know
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-08 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-05 21:06 Top 10 kernel oopses for the week ending January 5th, 2008 Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-05 21:26 ` Al Viro
2008-01-05 21:39 ` Al Viro
2008-01-07 17:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-01-08 1:19 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-01-08 3:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-08 5:59 ` Al Viro
2008-01-08 7:33 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-01-10 4:13 ` Neil Brown
2008-01-10 5:53 ` Al Viro
2008-01-10 5:53 ` Al Viro
2008-01-14 1:36 ` Neil Brown
2008-01-08 16:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-01-08 17:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-08 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-08 18:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-08 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-08 19:05 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2008-01-08 19:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-08 22:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-08 17:08 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-06 3:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-06 3:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-06 3:50 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 14:12 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-09 15:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4783C95C.7050303@linux.intel.com \
--to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=kjwinchester@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.