From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:00:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.lundman.net ([210.172.146.197]:54699 "EHLO mail.lundman.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20026956AbYAHXAe (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:00:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lundman.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF992299F3; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:00:27 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lundman.net Received: from mail.lundman.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eyot.interq.or.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HiiM1QWmbz4b; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:00:26 +0900 (JST) Received: from shinken.interq.or.jp (shinken.interq.or.jp [210.172.146.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lundman.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A16299E7; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:00:26 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <4784008A.1020106@lundman.net> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:00:26 +0900 From: Jorgen Lundman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.5) Gecko/20070725 SeaMonkey/1.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Lin CC: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: MIPS 4KEc with 2.6.15 References: <478174C1.2090708@lundman.net> <47824ACF.7050003@avtrex.com> <24f397b0801081402j24f7000cr841090ba5ab9bcc1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <24f397b0801081402j24f7000cr841090ba5ab9bcc1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 17958 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: lundman@lundman.net Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Yeha I would love to use tangox, but there is none with Linux, at least no tarball of the kernel I have found? Where can I get tangox? Lund Mark Lin wrote: > Jorgen, > > You should not be using the atlas definition. Try the tangox one instead. > > With the flush_cache_page changes, FUSE works fine for me using 2.6.15 > and Sigma's tango2 board. > > Mark Lin > > On Jan 7, 2008 10:52 AM, David Daney wrote: >> Jorgen Lundman wrote: >>> Hello list, >>> >>> I have an embedded device running 2.6.15 kernel on a MIPS 4KEc 300MHz >>> CPU. It was configured for Sigma's tango2 board, which I know nothing >>> about, so I picked a mips-board by random, "atlas", and found I can >>> produce working kernel module compiles. >>> >>> However, when I compiled FUSE kernel module, it behaves erratically in >>> a way making the FUSE developer think I may have come across the cache >>> coherency bug in arm and mips, fixed sometime around 2.6.17. >>> >>> Since I can not change the kernel that is running, I was looking for >>> alternate solutions. FUSE itself has a work around, that calls >>> flush_cache_page(), but I found that mips-board atlas does not have >>> this defined: >>> >>> fuse: Unknown symbol flush_cache_page >> There are cache coherency issues on the 8634. You should be using the >> vendor's very most recent kernels. For me they seem to have resolved >> the cache issues. >> >> Also as noted by others, you need the exact kernel sources if you are >> going to build working modules. >> >> David Daney >> >> > -- Jorgen Lundman | Unix Administrator | +81 (0)3 -5456-2687 ext 1017 (work) Shibuya-ku, Tokyo | +81 (0)90-5578-8500 (cell) Japan | +81 (0)3 -3375-1767 (home)