From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LIBATA SCSI command validation changed in 2.6.24
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:21:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4787FA06.9090204@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4787E574.6020304@redhat.com>
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 01/11/2008 04:35 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>>> commit 607126c2a21cd6e9bb807fdd415c1a992f7b9009 changed command
>>> validation
>>> to allow short commands in 16-byte CDBs, but it also made checking more
>>> strict. Before the change, a 10-byte SG_IO command could have its
>>> length set
>>> to 9 and still work. Now it fails. Not sure if this is a bug, but it has
>>> caused at least one application to fail that used to work (qpxtool.)
>>>
>>> [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428281]
>> Can you get us an example CDB? Its unclear if the hexdump in the bug
>> report is a returned mode page or the CDB or what...?
>>
>
> Not easily, but the maintainer of that program forced the length of
> the MODE_SENSE(10) command to 10 and that command started working.
>
> By looking at the source I could tell that it was setting the command
> length to (1 + the index of the last byte written to the CDB) and
> only wrote up to offset 8 when building the command, so it must have
> been sending the command with a length of 9. (It zeroed the whole CDB
> first and only wrote what it needed to.)
>
> (And it used the C++ operator [] to build the command, that was fun
> to trace...)
Even if allocation length is present in the CDB, the CDB may be missing
important information that is required to process the command. So it
may have caught a bug in the program... depending on the CDB.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-11 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-11 21:30 LIBATA SCSI command validation changed in 2.6.24 Chuck Ebbert
2008-01-11 21:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-01-11 21:53 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-01-11 23:21 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2008-01-11 23:28 ` Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4787FA06.9090204@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.