All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unify pagetable accessors patch causes double fault II
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:32:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <478C0D18.5020505@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080115010534.GA24854@one.firstfloor.org>

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:46:00PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>   
>> Andi Kleen wrote:
>>     
>>>> OK, I see the problem.  The problem is that the _PAGE_X defines are 
>>>> defined with _AC(UL, 1 << _PAGE_BIT_X), which has unsigned long type.  
>>>> This means that ~_PAGE_X also has unsigned long type, and so when cast 
>>>> to 64-bit in pte_mkX, it ends up &ing the pte with 0x00000000ffffffxxx, 
>>>> with predictable results.
>>>>    
>>>>         
>>> Actually I fixed some of that -- see the pgtable-nx patch on firstfloor -- 
>>> but
>>> it still doesn't work. Or maybe my patch was not complete.
>>>  
>>>       
>> Yeah, that looks like the right sort of thing, but I wonder if there's 
>> other places doing an open-coded "pte_val(pte) & ~_PAGE_FOO".  My patch 
>> changes the definition of _PAGE_FOO so it should be OK everywhere.
>>     
>
> Yes that's probably better. I just hit it because NX bits went missing.
>
>   
>>>> The original code just used signed constants for the _PAGE_X 
>>>> definitions, which will sign-extend when cast to 64-bit, and so have the 
>>>> upper bits set when masking.  (Well, actually, the old code just 
>>>> operated on pte_low, so the problem didn't arise; however, pgtable_64.h 
>>>> also uses integers for its _PAGE_X, which has the same sign-extended 
>>>> 32->64 casting property).
>>>>
>>>> I'll put together a fixup patch now.
>>>>    
>>>>         
>>> I'm leaving now but can test later.
>>>  
>>>       
>> Can you try this out?  It applies after "x86: move all asm/pgtable 
>> constants into one place".
>>     
>
> I just applied over the whole git-x86 patchkit (tip 
> 2f42671697ea9abc7d10ea7f663d6ef6e8ec6358)  + the two build fixes
> Unfortunately it didn't work, although the faulting loop is shorter now:
>   

Just to be clear, these two patches cause this oops to appear?  Current 
x86.git seems to be missing a pile of patches at the moment, so I 
presume you're using a version which does have my patch set?

> Freeing unused kernel memory: 260k freed
> mount[1159]: segfault at b7fcfe98 ip b7ec6b7a sp bfcfcdec error 7
> Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
>   page pfn = bfc33
>   page->flags = 80000014
>   page->count = 0
>   page->mapping = 00000000
>   vma->vm_ops = nfs_file_vm_ops+0x0/0x18
>   vma->vm_ops->nopage = 0x0
>   vma->vm_ops->fault = filemap_fault+0x0/0x34e
>   vma->vm_file->f_op->mmap = nfs_file_mmap+0x0/0x61
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at /home/lsrc/quilt/linux/mm/rmap.c:631!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Modules linked in:
>
> Pid: 1159, comm: mount Not tainted (2.6.24-rc7 #55)
> EIP: 0060:[<c0152a32>] EFLAGS: 00010282 CPU: 3
> EIP is at page_remove_rmap+0xcc/0xe7
> EAX: 00000037 EBX: c27f8660 ECX: 00000046 EDX: 00000046
> ESI: f7061c60 EDI: f7d87380 EBP: f7060e78 ESP: f7509df8
>  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
> Process mount (pid: 1159, ti=f7508000 task=f7460540 task.ti=f7508000)
> Stack: c27f8660 bfc33065 c014d166 00000000 f7061c60 f7509e80 00000000 00000000
>        00000000 00000001 b7fd0000 f7555010 f7d87380 c482e240 00000000 ffffffff
>        c16e0c0c 00000000 00000000 f7084df8 003d5ee2 b7fd0000 b7fd0000 00000000
> Call Trace:
>  [<c014d166>] unmap_vmas+0x349/0x5d1
>  [<c0150006>] exit_mmap+0x5f/0xcd
>  [<c011df0a>] mmput+0x25/0x79
>  [<c0122636>] do_exit+0x1a9/0x5eb
>  [<c0122ae3>] sys_exit_group+0x0/0xd
>  [<c0129dde>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x3e3/0x405
>  [<c04334b6>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x69f
>  [<c0102606>] do_notify_resume+0x7d/0x64e
>  [<c0120383>] printk+0x14/0x18
>  [<c0433874>] do_page_fault+0x3be/0x69f
>  [<c0433b4c>] do_page_fault+0x696/0x69f
>  [<c01508c1>] do_munmap+0x181/0x19b
>  [<c04334b6>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x69f
>  [<c0102f4e>] work_notifysig+0x13/0x19
>  =======================
> Code: 8b 46 44 8b 50 08 b8 d2 95 50 c0 e8 9c ad fe ff 8b 46 4c 85 c0 74 14 8b 40 10 85 c0 74 0d 8b 50 2c b8 f0 95 50 c0 e8 81 ad fe ff <0f> 0b eb fe 8b 53 10 89 d8 5b 5e 83 e2 01 f7 da 83 c2 04 e9 c5
> EIP: [<c0152a32>] page_remove_rmap+0xcc/0xe7 SS:ESP 0068:f7509df8
> ---[ end trace eb3c259ee0695fdd ]---
> Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!
> eth0: no IPv6 routers present
>
>   

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-15  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20080114094814.GA28300@basil.nowhere.org>
2008-01-14 12:56 ` unify pagetable accessors patch causes double fault II Andi Kleen
2008-01-14 13:06   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-14 13:58     ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-14 16:44       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-14 16:56         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-14 17:08           ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-14 17:18             ` unify pagetable accessors patch causes double fault III Andi Kleen
2008-01-14 19:00               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-14 19:54                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-14 20:15                 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-14 19:52           ` unify pagetable accessors patch causes double fault II Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-14 22:03       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-14 22:23         ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-14 22:46           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-15  1:05             ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-15  1:32               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-01-15  1:38                 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-15 21:03                   ` [patch] x86: lfence fix Ingo Molnar
2008-01-16  0:44                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-15 12:55               ` unify pagetable accessors patch causes double fault II Ingo Molnar
2008-01-15 16:53                 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-15 13:53             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-15 17:16               ` Folding _PAGE_PWT into _PAGE_PCD (was Re: unify pagetable accessors patch causes double fault II) Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-15 17:23                 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-15 17:32                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-15 17:39                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-15 20:30                 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-01-15 20:45                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-15 17:36               ` unify pagetable accessors patch causes double fault II Andi Kleen
2008-01-15 19:43                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=478C0D18.5020505@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.