Re: Namespaces exhausted CLONE_XXX bits problem

[Pavel Emelyanov <xemul-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 11:25 +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Hmm. I have an idea how to make this w/o a new system call. This might
>> look wierd, but. Why not stopple the last bit with a CLONE_NEWCLONE and
>> consider the parent_tidptr/child_tidptr in this case as the pointer to 
>> an array of extra arguments/flargs?
> 
> I guess that does keep us from having to add an _actual_ system call.

Exactly!

> Do we make the array something like
> 
> 	array[] = { orig_tidptr, nr_flags, actual flags... };

Not exactly. I have already sent my view of this in 
another letter.

> ?
> 
> -- Dave
> 
>