From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [NETFILTER 19/38]: Update feature-removal-schedule.txt Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:59:43 +0100 Message-ID: <478CE67F.3000807@trash.net> References: <20080115061907.3184.39432.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20080115061933.3184.26013.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <200801151615.m0FGFnL3010374@usagi.ingate.se> <478CE21A.80306@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jones Desougi , davem@davemloft.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:44675 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751001AbYAOQ74 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:59:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > If the iptables patches get applied now (and a new version be > released soon), an implicit 2 months extra time can be gained. That > would also empty my patch queue there. The best way would be if you resend everything that is relevant to the patches merged upstream and stuff like the autoconf patches etc., so I don't have to wade through one or two month of old emails trying to figure out which patches to apply. I'll be slow applying things until Saturday though.