From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cedric Le Goater Subject: Re: [PATCH] An attempt to have an unlimitedly extendable sys_clone Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:15:13 +0100 Message-ID: <478DBD11.7000104@fr.ibm.com> References: <478CAC32.4080809@openvz.org> <478CB73E.30603@fr.ibm.com> <478CC7AD.7060908@fr.ibm.com> <478DB4CC.1090102@openvz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <478DB4CC.1090102-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Pavel Emelyanov Cc: Linux Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> Here's the unshare part if you want to fold that with your patch. > > Thanks, Cedric. I'll pick that up. > >> Thanks, > > OK, thanks everyone, I'll try to cook the final patch today > and send it to Andrew as an RFC. yes. I'd changed the subject of the patch to something more explicit on what we're doing : 'use child_tidptr to extend clone() flags' we need feedback from the community on this clone extension ! :) C.