Re: OLS2008 "namespaces status update" report

[Kir Kolyshkin <kir-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

Guess we can have both. BOF format is a bit different (not too much 
time, more people), so better to have mini-summit first.

BTW does anybody knows whether the Kernel Summit will be "attached" to 
OLS this year?

Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> By the way, may be it is better to request a BOF rather than mini-summit
> to have a presentation of our work for a "outside" world...
>
> Regards,
> 	Den
>
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>   
>> Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>>     
>>> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Hi, guys.
>>>>
>>>> We're coming up to the deadline of proposals submissions for
>>>> OLS2008 and I noticed, that we didn't decide whether we're
>>>> going to make some summary report about the namespaces/cgroups
>>>> development status.
>>>>
>>>> I think it worth making this one.
>>>>         
>>> OK. Let's work on an abstract.
>>>       
>> Fine :) Actually the main question is - who will be 
>> responsible for this talk. If nobody objects I can 
>> take care of it ;)
>>
>>     
>>>> Besides, we can send a request for a mini-summit.
>>>>         
>>> Yes !
>>>       
>> :)
>>
>>     
>>> C.
>>>
>>>       
>> Thanks,
>> Pavel
>>
>>     
>
>