From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] 8250_pnp: register x86 COM ports at the conventional ttyS names Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:42:08 -0500 Message-ID: <478E6C20.2030005@zytor.com> References: <9MjWa-VI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <9MjWb-VI-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <9MlEG-3Mx-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <9Mmra-56f-29@gated-at.bofh.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:59420 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751446AbYAPUzO (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:55:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: 7eggert@gmx.de Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , Alan Cox Bodo Eggert wrote: > > BTW1: These addresses may be used to detect ports on non-standard addresses, > but unfortunately they don't tell the IRQ. > > BTW2: When I submitted a patch using the BIOS data area, I was told that it > might not exist on systems booting from non-PC firmware. This claim was not > yet backed with any knowledge, nor did anybody suggest a way to detect this > situation. > This is, of course, true. It doesn't exactly help that some (most?) non-PC firmware at least mimic the BIOS data area. In this particular case, there is some minor sanity-checking that can be done: the values should be nonzero and aligned 8. -hpa