From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFXD4-0005wG-M7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:03:18 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFXD3-0005vy-EU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:03:18 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFXD3-0005vr-6l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:03:17 -0500 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.184]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFXD2-0008A7-LU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:03:16 -0500 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so947992fkq.2 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:03:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <478F7AF5.80007@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:57:41 -0500 From: Robert William Fuller MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH]SVM CR8 undefined bug fix References: <14921864.post@talk.nabble.com> <478F79A3.3020108@csgraf.de> In-Reply-To: <478F79A3.3020108@csgraf.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Alexander Graf wrote: > TeLeMan wrote: >> env->cr[8] used by SVM codes was not defined. > As far as I remember cr8 is the very same as the TPR, so we only need to > implement one and map the other to the value we want. > My approach was to use the TPR and route the cr8 accesses to the tpr. > Even though I have to admit that this might not be consistent throughout > the code right now. Am I to understand this is a TPR report?