From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-commit: add a prepare-commit-msg hook
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:14:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47948C9B.7030100@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0801211101450.5731@racer.site>
> I have. But I want to avoid a regression at any cost. And your patch
> just looks to me like it could do that.
What kind of regression?
> But it _has_ been already suggested that you could provide arguments for
> the existing msg-hook, which would not break anything
Sure it won't break anything, but it won't work either! The existing
message hook runs after the editing session -- I want the hook to
introduce text that is merely a suggestion that the user can delete, or
a template that the user needs to customize further.
> since the hook does
> not get any argument yet, and therefore existing hooks would be
> unaffected.
How does adding a new hook affect existing hooks?
> Also, the change would be non-intrusive, easy-to-review
Please. That's ludicrous.
My patch is 3 lines of inserted code and 0 modified lines, checking one
variable that is set once in builtin-commit.c (edit_message). The
documentation says that it runs whenever the editor runs except for -c,
and launch_editor runs after the 3 lines of code I inserted.
Seeing how biased you are, I don't really know why I bothered answering you.
> take so much time away from the bug-fixing that we want to do right now in
That's the first sensible argument that I hear.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-21 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-18 14:51 [PATCH] git-commit: add a prepare-commit-msg hook Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-18 15:47 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-18 15:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-18 16:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-18 16:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-18 18:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-18 18:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-18 19:01 ` Benoit Sigoure
2008-01-18 19:05 ` Alex Riesen
2008-01-18 19:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-18 21:08 ` Alex Riesen
2008-01-18 22:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-19 9:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-19 11:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-19 15:41 ` Benoit Sigoure
2008-01-19 16:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-20 22:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-21 6:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-21 11:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-21 12:14 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2008-01-21 12:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-21 12:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-21 22:44 ` Junio C Hamano
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-21 14:27 Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47948C9B.7030100@gnu.org \
--to=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.