From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laszlo Attila Toth Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] Introducing socket mark socket option Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:44:48 +0100 Message-ID: <47960160.2090908@balabit.hu> References: <12010126891806-git-send-email-panther@balabit.hu> Reply-To: panther@balabit.hu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Patrick McHardy , Netfilter Developer Mailing List To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from www.balabit.hu ([212.92.18.33]:60274 "EHLO lists.balabit.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750992AbYAVOov (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:44:51 -0500 Received: from balabit.hu (unknown [10.80.0.254]) by lists.balabit.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17538C13EF for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:44:50 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt =EDrta: > On Jan 22 2008 15:38, Laszlo Attila Toth wrote: >> If netfilter is enabled, a userspace program may wish to set the mar= k for >> each packets its send instead of using the MARK target. >> > For systems where conntrack and xtables is not loaded, I presume? > Sounds reasonable. >=20 =46or this... yes, but mainly in junction with the mark match and mark=20 based routing. --=20 Panther - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html