From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Pearson Subject: Re: 1.0.16rc1 release Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:39:47 +0000 Message-ID: <47962A63.8020204@moving-picture.com> References: <47961880.3090309@moving-picture.com> <479624A6.7040700@moving-picture.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moving-picture.com (mpc-26.sohonet.co.uk [193.203.82.251]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D06103805 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:39:48 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: ALSA development List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Takashi Iwai wrote: >> >>>Or, RH has an uncomplete mutex implementation? >> >>Don't know - see above? > > > Looks like so... Sigh. > > Can someone report RedHat to fix their kernel? May be that should be someone that has an interest in sound and has recently started working for RedHat ?? Is it possible to define mutex_destroy in the ALSA code if it isn't defined elsewhere for this case? Thanks James Pearson