All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: Kyle Howell <khowell@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] x86_64 user/system process accounting
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:10:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <479774E9.3080405@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BF58A8AFB316514587D61EADBFBF4C41017466AD@Alpha1>

Kyle Howell wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Kyle Howell wrote:
>>>>> Kyle Howell wrote:
>>>>>> I'm running Xenomai 2.4.1 against Linux 2.6.23.12 on an
>>>>> x86_64 (Core2)
>>>>>> system. I'm finding that all of my CPU cycles are being accounted
> 
>>>>>> as kernel time rather than user time. The correct processes are 
>>>>>> still billed, but the system is always 0% user. I'm wondering if
>>>>> this problem
>>>>>> is specific to my setup, or if it is a real bug. Can anyone else 
>>>>>> out there running x86_64 confirm or deny this behavior?
>> I currently have my fingers on a box with 2.6.23.14 with 
>> Xenomai 2.4.1 and I-pipe 1.4-01 (all standard), but I'm not 
>> able to reproduce your effect. Some simple shell loop nicely 
>> loads one CPU at 100%, and /proc/stat looks like this:
>>
>> cpu  38794 0 6325 411304 2882 0 3265 0
>> cpu0 34786 0 3094 189892 413 0 2716 0
>> cpu1 4007 0 3231 221411 2468 0 548 0
> 
> Well, I'm not sure whether to be happy or sad. Thanks for checking. 
> 
>> Could you send me your full .config?
> 
> I've attached my latest .config.

That one makes the difference: it's reproducible on some test box! /me
has to find the magic switch now...

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux


  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-23 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-22 19:10 [Xenomai-help] x86_64 user/system process accounting Kyle Howell
2008-01-22 19:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-01-22 20:34   ` Kyle Howell
2008-01-22 21:22     ` Jan Kiszka
2008-01-23 15:12       ` Jan Kiszka
2008-01-23 15:53         ` Kyle Howell
2008-01-23 17:10           ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2008-01-24  9:50             ` Jan Kiszka
2008-01-24 15:32               ` Kyle Howell
2008-01-25 14:21                 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-01-25 16:45                   ` Jan Kiszka
2008-01-26 15:00                     ` Philippe Gerum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=479774E9.3080405@domain.hid \
    --to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
    --cc=khowell@domain.hid \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.