From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <479788A5.80407@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:34:13 +0100 From: Philippe Gerum MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2ff1a98a0801020231k19be7d89k1a6f04b7d497cc34@domain.hid> <18315.63245.160672.547658@domain.hid> <18326.21480.397736.413726@domain.hid> <47977DE1.8060207@domain.hid> <2ff1a98a0801230953m2a67e614s6c921b3b6ec77c3c@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <2ff1a98a0801230953m2a67e614s6c921b3b6ec77c3c@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Philippe Gerum Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] High latencies on ARM. Reply-To: rpm@xenomai.org List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai-core Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On Jan 23, 2008 6:48 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> > Please find attached a patch implementing these ideas. This adds some >>> > clutter, which I would be happy to reduce. Better ideas are welcome. >>> > >>> >>> Ok. New version of the patch, this time split in two parts, should >>> hopefully make it more readable. >>> >> Ack. I'd suggest the following: >> >> - let's have a rate limiter when walking the zombie queue in >> __xnpod_finalize_zombies. We hold the superlock here, and what the patch >> also introduces is the potential for flushing more than a single TCB at >> a time, which might not always be a cheap operation, depending on which >> cra^H^Hode runs on behalf of the deletion hooks for instance. We may >> take for granted that no sane code would continuously create more >> threads than we would be able to finalize in a given time frame anyway. > > The maximum number of zombies in the queue is > 1 + XNARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW, since a zombie is added to the queue > only if a deleted thread is xnpod_current_thread(), or if the XNLOCKSW > bit is armed. Ack. rate_limit = 1? I'm really reluctant to increase the WCET here, thread deletion isn't cheap already. -- Philippe.