All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Burns <bburns@redhat.com>
To: Bill Burns <bburns@redhat.com>
Cc: Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Carb,
	Brian A" <Brian.Carb@unisys.com>
Subject: Re: Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using	unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:06:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4799DEEF.4000302@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4798C97F.1040907@redhat.com>

Bill Burns wrote:
> Bill Burns wrote:
>> Ian Pratt wrote:
>>>>>> No, I have not tried on 3.2.0. Will see if I can at some
>>>>>> point...
>>>>> Also, do you have any more info to share on what actually goes wrong
>>>> when
>>>>> dom0 has 'too much' memory?
>>>>>
>>>> The dom0 kernel spits out messages like the following starting around
>>>> the
>>>> init of cpu1 time, and periodically thereafter.
>>>>
>>>> Timer ISR/0: Time went backwards: delta=-50206266948
>>> delta_cpu=13733052
>>>> shadow=8186343367 off=13649733458 processed=72042343367
>>>> cpu_processed=21822343367
>>>>
>>>> Eventually just hanging (or making such slow progress to be
>>>> effectively hung).
>>> How many CPUs does the system have? Does the same large memory issue
>>> occur if you have fewer physical CPUs?
>>>
>> The system has 64 but is only built for 32, so the others are
>> ignored. Don't know if the problem happens with less CPUs at
>> this point. Hope to get more data soon...
>>
> 
> Interestingly, the symptom seems to disappear with a
> Hypervisor built to support all 64 CPUs. But I need to
> get more time on the system to say that for sure.
> 
Disregard the previous. It still happens. Continuing to debug..

 Bill



>  Bill
> 
> 
> 
>> Thanks,
>>  Bill
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ian
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-25 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-10  2:15 Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate Carb, Brian A
2008-01-15 13:50 ` Bill Burns
2008-01-15 14:44   ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-15 16:15     ` Bill Burns
2008-01-15 16:29       ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-16 15:45         ` Bill Burns
2008-01-17 14:10           ` Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s " Ian Pratt
2008-01-18 13:03             ` Bill Burns
2008-01-24 17:23               ` Bill Burns
2008-01-25 13:06                 ` Bill Burns [this message]
2008-01-28 14:02                   ` Bill Burns
2008-01-28 14:08                     ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-28 20:38                       ` Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb usingunstablec/s " Carb, Brian A
2008-01-28 21:12                         ` Bill Burns
2008-01-29  8:44                         ` Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gbusingunstablec/s " Jan Beulich
2008-01-30 16:20                       ` Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s " Bill Burns
2008-01-30 16:45                         ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-31 18:12                           ` Bill Burns
2008-02-01  8:36                             ` Keir Fraser
2008-02-01 12:40                               ` Bill Burns
2008-02-01 20:10                                 ` Bill Burns
2008-02-08 13:49                                   ` Large system boot problems Bill Burns
2008-02-08 14:04                                     ` Keir Fraser
2008-02-08 15:10                                       ` Bill Burns
2008-02-08 15:14                                         ` Keir Fraser
2008-02-08 15:22                                           ` Bill Burns
2008-02-08 15:45                                             ` Keir Fraser
2008-02-12 16:34                                               ` Bill Burns
2008-02-12 16:54                                                 ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4799DEEF.4000302@redhat.com \
    --to=bburns@redhat.com \
    --cc=Brian.Carb@unisys.com \
    --cc=Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.