From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Fehlig Subject: Re: That xenstored console leak... Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:21:43 -0700 Message-ID: <479A0C97.6010103@novell.com> References: <479A002E.6010802@novell.com> <20080125154123.GD19653@totally.trollied.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080125154123.GD19653@totally.trollied.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: John Levon Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org John Levon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 08:28:46AM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > > >>> Which of your three xend patches ought to be ported to 3.2 (and 3.1?) >>> branches? >>> >> All three for 3.2. In fact, all of the testing was done on 3.2 branch >> (they apply cleanly there). Not sure about 3.1 as I haven't played with >> it for several months. >> > > I've lost track a bit. 3.1 /does/ need to fix the "MAC address is lost" > problem but currently /doesn't/ have the "/vm/blah is leaked" problems. > > If someone can translate that into a patch for me to backport I can try > it out on our bits. > Yuk. Changesets 15957 (and subsequent adjustment via c/s 15967) fix the "MAC address is lost problem" but introduce the /vm/blah leak. You could try the last patch I submitted on this thread to fix that. So 15957, 15967, and my proposed patch should do the trick. Jim