From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <479DD9D7.5010207@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:34:15 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080123065221.GB6573@domain.hid> <2ff1a98a0801230204s15e4eefaifdd2c946c44549df@domain.hid> <2ff1a98a0801230515i77f8c22bk866c4cd592a3a9b8@domain.hid> <20080124094150.GA7503@domain.hid> <2ff1a98a0801240202g83ca10esd2f7fc928946e3c1@domain.hid> <20080125100404.GA8833@domain.hid> <2ff1a98a0801250900if03294epded12290544d5480@domain.hid> <20080128085123.GA7297@domain.hid> <2ff1a98a0801280519m62768928x5e5fa40123abe9cd@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <2ff1a98a0801280519m62768928x5e5fa40123abe9cd@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] AT91SAM9260 latency List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: jagarcia@domain.hid, xenomai@xenomai.org Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > ... > The behaviour you get may be due, for instance, to the fact that the > processor goes into some sleep mode when idle and to a wake-up > latency; if you run some load, there is no wake-up latency. It is hard > to say anything. In order to investigate, I would instrument the > kernel to trace the irq masking sections. Don't we have the I-pipe tracer on this platform? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux