From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: INAKOSHI Hiroya Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] dm-band: The I/O bandwidth controller: Performance Report Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:42:17 +0900 Message-ID: <479ECAC9.5070709@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20080123.215350.193721890.ryov@valinux.co.jp> <20080125.160720.183032233.ryov@valinux.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080125.160720.183032233.ryov@valinux.co.jp> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ryo Tsuruta Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids Hi, Ryo Tsuruta wrote: > The results of bandwidth control test on band-groups. > ===================================================== > The configurations of the test #3: > o Prepare three partitions sdb5 and sdb6. > o Create two extra band-groups on sdb5, the first is of user1 and the > second is of user2. > o Give weights of 40, 20, 10 and 10 to the user1 band-group, the user2 > band-group, the default group of sdb5 and sdb6 respectively. > o Run 128 processes issuing random read/write direct I/O with 4KB data > on each device at the same time. you mean that you run 128 processes on each user-device pairs? Namely, I guess that user1: 128 processes on sdb5, user2: 128 processes on sdb5, another: 128 processes on sdb5, user2: 128 processes on sdb6. > Conclusions and future works > ============================ > Dm-band works well with random I/Os. I have a plan on running some tests > using various real applications such as databases or file servers. > If you have any other good idea to test dm-band, please let me know. The second preliminary studies might be: - What if you use a different I/O size on each device (or device-user pair)? - What if you use a different number of processes on each device (or device-user pair)? And my impression is that it's natural dm-band is in device-mapper, separated from I/O scheduler. Because bandwidth control and I/O scheduling are two different things, it may be simpler that they are implemented in different layers. Regards, Hiroya. > > Thank you, > Ryo Tsuruta. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > >