From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [libata] sata_mv: Remove PCI dependency Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:26:32 -0500 Message-ID: <479F53B8.8010500@garzik.org> References: <11966101971581-git-send-email-saeed.bishara@gmail.com> <1196610199229-git-send-email-saeed.bishara@gmail.com> <47684270.5030405@garzik.org> <478DD615.1050309@garzik.org> <47944A51.2090504@gmail.com> <4796BCEB.1090207@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:51605 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751870AbYA2Q0h (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:26:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: saeed bishara Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Bishara , Mark Lord saeed bishara wrote: > Hi Jeff, > what is the status of this patch? > I'd like to have this patch, and a second part that adds support for > the SoC devices, to be merged into 2.6.25. please note that my patch > collides with Mark's patches, I don't mind to rebase mine above Mark's > patches, but, in that case I need to wait till you ack the later ones. > right? Sorry, I found your 1/17 patch buried inside a thread. In the future, it would be helpful to rewrite the subject from Re: [patch 1/2] sata_mv: ... to [patch v2] sata_mv: ... so that its clear that is a patch to be queued. Jeff