From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [NETFILTER]: xt_hashlimit match, revision 1 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:24:18 +0100 Message-ID: <479F6142.2000905@trash.net> References: <479F245A.2030509@trash.net> <479F46C9.2010102@trash.net> <479F5EDC.8050207@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:60078 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750837AbYA2RYW (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:24:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Jan 29 2008 18:14, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>> Could you push the outstanding patches to Dave, or give me a git >>> repository to sync against? >> I'll try to push my patches to Dave tonight or tommorrow. >> > Do I get an ack on the annotation 15 patches? :) > I haven't looked into them yet, but some of them will probably clash with some naming unification patches I have queued (struct nf_conn *conntrack -> struct nf_conn *ct everywhere). There are also the iptables netns patches which might cause clashes, I'll let you know when I get to them.