From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: NFCT ulogd pluging [was Re: [ULOGD RFC 11/30] NFCT: make reconfigurable] Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:51:23 +0100 Message-ID: <47A0D53B.4090103@trash.net> References: <20080130185847.693274384@kruemel.intranet.astaro.de> <20080130190127.847510508@kruemel.intranet.astaro.de> <47A0D063.7040807@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , heitzenberger@astaro.com, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, holger@eitzenberger.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:59840 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754363AbYA3Tv7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:51:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47A0D063.7040807@netfilter.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > Hi, > > JFYI: conntrackd also does connection tracking accounting so I'm not > sure if ulogd should do this as well via the NFCT plugin. This looks > like duplicated effort IMO and, as for now, conntrackd also provides > userspace conntrack table dumping without locking the kernel via > `conntrackd -i' which is a feature that ulogd does not provide. > Mhh .. I'm not sure how that is duplicated effort, we're talking about two different programs that do completely different things. Locking is not an issue BTW, I have patches queued which finally move conntrack to RCU.