All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Thibault <jonathan@navigue.com>
To: bridge@lists.osdl.org
Subject: [Bridge] Bridged vlan issue.
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:58:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A0D6F8.5010600@navigue.com> (raw)

I have a strange issue with bridged vlan interfaces.  I've discussed it 
at length in the ebtables mailing list and have gotten a fair bit of 
valuable feedback from there.  It is still a bit unclear where the 
problem resides but it definitely seems ARP related.

First of all, this is kernel 2.6.23.  I have two tg3 gigabit interfaces 
on the box, conveniently named:  'out' and 'in'.  The vlans are on the 
'in' side of the bridge, so in.2, in.3, in.4 ... in.6 while the 'out' 
interface is plain untagged ethernet.

As it is now, I only use ebtables to filter out anything that isn't ipv4 
or arp, I do the rest of my filtering through iptables.  There is also 
no STP on the bridge or anywhere in our network, though we might use it 
once I get this fixed.

In its current, working condition, the bridge (br0) has interfaces 
'in.2' and 'out' with the clients on the 'in' side of the bridge, and 
the internet gateway on the 'out' side.  Does the job brilliantly.

I start having problems when in.3 is added to the bridge (it exists and 
is up on the box, just not on the bridge).  There are still no clients 
in vlan 3, but when I add it to the bridge, the bridge won't relay ARP 
replies from the gateway to some of my clients in vlan2, effectively 
disabling their internet.

The strange thing is that I see the reply come into the 'out' interface 
(with tcpdump), I see it on the 'br0' interface, and I also see it on 
the in.2 interface where it should be on its way to the customer.  But 
putting a hub between the customer and the bridge box, I never see it.  
It's as if the arp reply just vanished just before it got fed to the 
ethernet cable.  To the linux box, it's been sent, but it never shows up 
on the trunk.

I've also validated this by testing when only 'in.2' and 'out' are on 
the bridge, I see both requests and replies for affected customers go 
through the hub and everything works.

I know the tg3 driver does some vlan acceleration of sorts, that might 
have something to do with it, but something tells me I'd have the same 
problem with just one vlan interface on the bridge then.

As I said before, this only manifests in our production environment, so 
I have to be pretty careful with scheduling tests and what not, but I'd 
very much love some ideas to figure out where the vanishing packets go.

Jonathan

             reply	other threads:[~2008-01-30 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-30 19:58 Jonathan Thibault [this message]
2008-02-05 19:55 ` [Bridge] Bridged vlan issue Jonathan Thibault

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47A0D6F8.5010600@navigue.com \
    --to=jonathan@navigue.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.