From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [NETFILTER 00/69]: Netfilter Update Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:27:31 +0100 Message-ID: <47A0EBC3.4000304@trash.net> References: <20080130201650.29874.7456.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:62347 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752895AbYA3V2I (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:28:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Jan 30 2008 21:16, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> following is the final netfilter update for 2.6.25. containing the iptables >> netns work by Alexey Dobriyan, lots of sparse warning fixes by Stephen, Eric >> and myself, const annotations throughout netfilter by Jan Engelhardt, >> a set of patches to finally use RCU for the conntrack and NAT hashes, some >> conntrack optimizations and some minor misc cleanups. >> > > What do people use to apply this batch? I exported them into an MBOX > and tried git-am, but that always uses the mail's From: and Subject: > rather than the --raw patch after the three-dashes. > I'll push my tree to netfilter.org, things are going pretty slow, but it should appear at http://people.netfilter.org/~kaber/nf-2.6.git within the next 30 minutes or so.