From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [NETFILTER 00/69]: Netfilter Update Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:31:17 +0100 Message-ID: <47A0ECA5.6070009@trash.net> References: <20080130201650.29874.7456.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <47A0EBC3.4000304@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:62421 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752970AbYA3Vb5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:31:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: [dave taken out of CC since I don't think he cares] Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Jan 30 2008 22:27, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>> >>> >>>> following is the final netfilter update for 2.6.25. containing the iptables >>>> netns work by Alexey Dobriyan, lots of sparse warning fixes by Stephen, >>>> Eric >>>> and myself, const annotations throughout netfilter by Jan Engelhardt, >>>> a set of patches to finally use RCU for the conntrack and NAT hashes, some >>>> conntrack optimizations and some minor misc cleanups. >>>> >>>> >>> What do people use to apply this batch? I exported them into an MBOX >>> and tried git-am, but that always uses the mail's From: and Subject: >>> rather than the --raw patch after the three-dashes. >>> >> I'll push my tree to netfilter.org, things are going pretty slow, >> but it should appear at http://people.netfilter.org/~kaber/nf-2.6.git >> within the next 30 minutes or so. >> > > Do you have git://? > No.