From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [NETFILTER 00/69]: Netfilter Update Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:34:38 +0100 Message-ID: <47A0ED6E.4070402@trash.net> References: <20080130201650.29874.7456.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <47A0EBC3.4000304@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:62494 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751666AbYA3VfN (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:35:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47A0EBC3.4000304@trash.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Patrick McHardy wrote: > Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Jan 30 2008 21:16, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> >>> following is the final netfilter update for 2.6.25. containing the >>> iptables >>> netns work by Alexey Dobriyan, lots of sparse warning fixes by >>> Stephen, Eric >>> and myself, const annotations throughout netfilter by Jan Engelhardt, >>> a set of patches to finally use RCU for the conntrack and NAT >>> hashes, some >>> conntrack optimizations and some minor misc cleanups. >>> >> >> What do people use to apply this batch? I exported them into an MBOX >> and tried git-am, but that always uses the mail's From: and Subject: >> rather than the --raw patch after the three-dashes. >> > > I'll push my tree to netfilter.org, things are going pretty slow, > but it should appear at http://people.netfilter.org/~kaber/nf-2.6.git > within the next 30 minutes or so. Its there now.