From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JKgxR-0005d2-Jq for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:28:29 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKgxQ-0005bE-Ch for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:28:28 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKgxP-0005a6-LA for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:28:27 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKgxP-0005Zv-8y for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:28:27 -0500 Received: from pne-smtpout4-sn1.fre.skanova.net ([81.228.11.168]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JKgxP-0006GQ-1N for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:28:27 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (88.193.32.97) by pne-smtpout4-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.3.129) id 474FD02100317B51 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:27:59 +0100 Message-ID: <47A23D84.8070900@nic.fi> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:28:36 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vesa_J=E4=E4skel=E4inen?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <1201731230.15073.45.camel@solid.paris.klabs.be> <20080130222921.GC7679@thorin> <1201736725.15073.70.camel@solid.paris.klabs.be> <1201812869.4747.5.camel@dv> In-Reply-To: <1201812869.4747.5.camel@dv> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) Subject: Re: Questions for writing manpages X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:28:28 -0000 >> echo (${root}) > ( hd0,1 ) >> ls (${root}) > error: unknown device Is there a reason why root does not contain (hd0,1) (in this case) I think there was once change related to ()'s in codebase... perhaps this was "broken" accidently?