From: Bill Burns <bburns@redhat.com>
To: Bill Burns <bburns@redhat.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com>,
"Carb, Brian A" <Brian.Carb@unisys.com>
Subject: Re: Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:10:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A37CBE.4070009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47A31339.4010706@redhat.com>
Bill Burns wrote:
> Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 31/1/08 18:12, "Bill Burns" <bburns@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I instrumented read_pmtimer_count and it does get called a couple
>>> of times during startup and it returns an increasing value. I made
>>> no attempt to determine if the rate was correct.
>>>
>>> I also tried the 3.1.3 and 3.2.0 Hypervisors and they exhibit
>>> the same problem on the es7000.
>>>
>>> It's not clear if is this a platform specific problem
>>> or not. So far the only reports of the problem are on the
>>> es7000. So for now I am running the attached patch to
>>> avoid the pmtimer on es7000 only.
>> Fair enough, but obviously this does need to be fixed: while not understood
>> it could point to any amount of other badness or corruption happening in the
>> background that we simply have not yet discovered.
>>
>> -- Keir
>>
>
>
> I am hoping to get some feedback on a similar large
> system. Limiting dom0 memory seems to be the standard
> operating procedure on large memory systems so if it's
> a common problem then it's being masked.
>
Got a report on a non-es7000 failure as well. They did not
indicate the actual failure, but said it failed to boot.
They induced the failure by both increasing the value of the
dom0_mem arg and by removing the arg entirely. They did not try
clocksource, but I have aske them too. So we can't be sure
yet that it's the same thing. But I think odds are it is.
Bill
> Bill
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-01 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-10 2:15 Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate Carb, Brian A
2008-01-15 13:50 ` Bill Burns
2008-01-15 14:44 ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-15 16:15 ` Bill Burns
2008-01-15 16:29 ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-16 15:45 ` Bill Burns
2008-01-17 14:10 ` Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s " Ian Pratt
2008-01-18 13:03 ` Bill Burns
2008-01-24 17:23 ` Bill Burns
2008-01-25 13:06 ` Bill Burns
2008-01-28 14:02 ` Bill Burns
2008-01-28 14:08 ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-28 20:38 ` Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb usingunstablec/s " Carb, Brian A
2008-01-28 21:12 ` Bill Burns
2008-01-29 8:44 ` Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gbusingunstablec/s " Jan Beulich
2008-01-30 16:20 ` Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s " Bill Burns
2008-01-30 16:45 ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-31 18:12 ` Bill Burns
2008-02-01 8:36 ` Keir Fraser
2008-02-01 12:40 ` Bill Burns
2008-02-01 20:10 ` Bill Burns [this message]
2008-02-08 13:49 ` Large system boot problems Bill Burns
2008-02-08 14:04 ` Keir Fraser
2008-02-08 15:10 ` Bill Burns
2008-02-08 15:14 ` Keir Fraser
2008-02-08 15:22 ` Bill Burns
2008-02-08 15:45 ` Keir Fraser
2008-02-12 16:34 ` Bill Burns
2008-02-12 16:54 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47A37CBE.4070009@redhat.com \
--to=bburns@redhat.com \
--cc=Brian.Carb@unisys.com \
--cc=Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.