From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Mahoney Date: Fri Feb 1 16:48:35 2008 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] Re: [patch 0/5] [patch 0/5] Compatibility fixes for SLES10 In-Reply-To: <47A398A5.6040804@oracle.com> References: <20080131204634.478915000@suse.com> <47A398A5.6040804@oracle.com> Message-ID: <47A3B8A1.1010209@suse.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sunil Mushran wrote: > While I've not tested it, the patches here look good. > > What about the breakup of the earlier patch? Will it > be applied atop these? Hahah, oops. Those are coming. I saw the code in my git tree and thought you'd applied them as a whole. It turns out I was just being monumentally stupid, since I had committed them locally to the tree to generate an easy diff. I thought it curious that the commit log had my local machines in the email address fields. I'll have those for you over the weekend. I apparently need more sleep. ;) - -Jeff > Jeff Mahoney wrote: >> Hi guys - >> >> I just merged today's git tree against SLES10. There were a few >> errors and a few warnings that have been there all along. This >> patch set creates new checks to fix all of them. >> >> -Jeff >> >> -- >> Jeff Mahoney >> SUSE Labs >> >> > - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHo7ihLPWxlyuTD7IRApriAJ92MWOxXj3aXfxRsLzsl+5FN/sANwCfYeLM n9Yc+DI5Csum2xY0ftnAhGs= =rOJW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----