From: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: data corruption with dmcrypt/LUKS
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 23:06:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A63AD3.6080501@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202050237.3200.33.camel@fermat.scientia.net>
Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> <when I diff -q -r /mnt/unencrypted /mnt/encrypted/ here, everything is
> ok but this is just, because those files are still cached in RAM>
> <unmount + close mapping + reboot>
> <create mappings and mount everything again>
>
> Here's the first problem:
> 1) When I now diff the two versions again (the unencrypted and the one
> from the encrypted partition) I get differences...
> I'm quite sure that this is not due to damaged RAM or harddisk (checked
> several times with memtest and badblocks) and the corruption is always
> the same, although not fully reproducibly.
> The filesystem tree itself seems to be the same on both discs (but I'm
> not sure if the permissions and owners are copied correctly), but there
> are differences in some (though not all) files.
> The difference is always the same, that for one or more bytes of the
> affected files, the hexcode is reduced by 0x10
> That is:
> If the file contains a byte "T" (0x74) on the unencrypted partition it
> will have a "D" (0x64) on the encrypted.
Hi,
Are you sure, that your USB-stick is not faulty ?
Could you reproduce it with different piece of hw ?
(Several strange reports for dm-crypt over USB were identified to be
USB hw faults.)
> 2) The second bug happens only rarely and leads to a panic.
> Unfortunately it's difficult to reproduce, but it always happened when I
> mkfs.ext3 on the /dev/mapper/sda2.
> There's a stack-trace printed which clearly involves some dmcrypt
> lines...
But no stack trace attached here... please attach it.
It can be known bug which was fixed in stable version some time ago
see http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/20/211
> btw: are there any other currently known bugs in dmcrypt? Or is it
> considered as "production stable"?
No known bugs causing data corruption, no such reports so far
for stable kernel.
Milan
--
mbroz@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-03 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-03 14:50 data corruption with dmcrypt/LUKS Christoph Anton Mitterer
2008-02-03 22:06 ` Milan Broz [this message]
2008-02-04 0:43 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2008-02-04 9:17 ` Milan Broz
2008-02-05 1:28 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
[not found] ` <47B3639F.10809@yahoo.it>
2008-02-15 21:25 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47A63AD3.6080501@redhat.com \
--to=mbroz@redhat.com \
--cc=calestyo@scientia.net \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.