From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-core: unblacklist HITACHI drives Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:04:20 -0500 Message-ID: <47A9A244.2050607@garzik.org> References: <20080204182421.GA22434@dhcp-210.hsv.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:40548 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762283AbYBFMEX (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:04:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080204182421.GA22434@dhcp-210.hsv.redhat.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: David Milburn Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org David Milburn wrote: > The HITACHI HDS7250SASUN500G and HITACHI HDS7225SBSUN250 drives > do not need to be blacklisted, the NCQ problem has been resolved > with the "sata_nv: fix for completion handling" patch. > > Signed-off-by David Milburn > --- > > libata-core.c | 2 -- > 1 files changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c > index bdbd55a..ba5406e 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c > @@ -4154,8 +4154,6 @@ static const struct ata_blacklist_entry ata_device_blacklist [] = { > /* NCQ is broken */ > { "Maxtor *", "BANC*", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ }, > { "Maxtor 7V300F0", "VA111630", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ }, > - { "HITACHI HDS7250SASUN500G*", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ }, > - { "HITACHI HDS7225SBSUN250G*", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ }, > { "ST380817AS", "3.42", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ }, > { "ST3160023AS", "3.42", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ }, applied