From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Courtier-Dutton Subject: Re: HG vs GIT Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:06:33 +1100 Message-ID: <47AB0259.6060604@superbug.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8379103833 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:05:56 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jaroslav Kysela Cc: ALSA development List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > Hi, > > it seems that GIT matured somewhat. git-push has been implemneted. > It was main reason to not use GIT when we made decision between HG and > GIT. > As we could have potential problems with branches in HG > repository, I would like to consider a switch to GIT althought it means > some changes in my scripts on ALSA server and my ksync tool. > I just successfully tried (a bit modified hg-to-git.py script) and > it seems to be working properly. > Any objections? > > Jaroslav > I have no problem with moving to git. Just so long as we can still create alsa-driver packages from it. Will the git tree just be alsa-kernel, or will it be the entire linux kernel with the latest alsa additions? James