From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A8DDDEDA for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 01:07:13 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <47AB1023.9040707@ru.mvista.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:05:23 +0300 From: Valentine Barshak MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Imre Kaloz Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD support for the AMCC Taishan References: <120203530465-git-send-email-kaloz@openwrt.org> <20080207060012.788e4258@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <47AB0BC3.2000202@ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Stefan Roese List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Imre Kaloz wrote: > Well, arch/ppc calculates the mtd2 dynamically and doesn't create > a separate partition for kozio. That dynamic size calculation depends on the flash size. The board I use has a 64MB NOR flash (I'm not aware of other Taishan boards having chips of different size). So AFAIU if such board exists, we'll need a cuboot flash-size fixup. Thanks, Valentine. > > I've based this on how it's currently done for the Sequoia, too. > > > Imre > > On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:46:43 +0100, Valentine Barshak > wrote: > >> Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:29:55 +0100 >>> "Imre Kaloz" wrote: >>> >>>> *bump*? :) If anything is wrong with it, please let me know. >> >> The arch/ppc had a bit different partition table. >> Something like this: >> mtd0: 00180000 00040000 "kernel" >> mtd1: 00200000 00040000 "root" >> mtd2: 03bc0000 00040000 "user" >> mtd3: 00080000 00040000 "env" >> mtd4: 00040000 00040000 "u-boot" >> >> Thanks, >> Valentine. >> >>> Nothing wrong that I could see. I just need to test it first. >>> josh >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linuxppc-dev mailing list >>> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org >>> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev >> > >