From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, john.ronciak@intel.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com
Subject: Re: e1000 1sec latency problem
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:58:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47AB38AB.8050001@qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080207141718.GA2030@elf.ucw.cz>
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have the famous e1000 latency problems:
>
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=70 ttl=56 time=1004.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=71 ttl=56 time=308.9 ms
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=72 ttl=56 time=305.4 ms
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=73 ttl=56 time=9.8 ms
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=74 ttl=56 time=3.7 ms
>
> ...and they are still there in 2.6.25-git0. I had ethernet EEPROM
> checksum problems, which I fixed by the update, but problems are not
> gone.
>
> irqpoll helps.
>
> nosmp (which implies XT-PIC is being used) does not help.
>
> 16: 1925 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ahci, yenta, uhci_hcd:usb2, eth0
>
> Booting kernel with nosmp/ no yenta, no usb does not help.
>
> Hmm, as expected, interrupt load on ahci (find /) makes latencies go
> away.
>
> It should be easily reproducible on x60 with latest bios, it is 100%
> reproducible for me...
So you don't think it's related to the interrupt coalescing by any chance ?
I'd suggest to try and disable the coalescing and see if it makes any difference.
We've had lots of issues with coalescing misbehavior. Not this bad (ie 1 second) though.
Add this to modprobe.conf and reload e1000 module
options e1000 RxIntDelay=0,0 RxAbsIntDelay=0,0 InterruptThrottleRate=0,0 TxIntDelay=0,0 TxAbsIntDelay=0,0
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-07 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-07 14:17 e1000 1sec latency problem Pavel Machek
2008-02-07 16:58 ` Max Krasnyansky [this message]
2008-02-07 17:25 ` [E1000-devel] " Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 18:06 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-07 18:12 ` Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 18:30 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-07 18:40 ` Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 18:55 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-07 18:17 ` Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 22:24 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-07 22:32 ` Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 22:37 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-07 23:12 ` Kok, Auke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-07 22:31 Martin Rogge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47AB38AB.8050001@qualcomm.com \
--to=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.