From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rene Herman Subject: Re: HG vs GIT Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:12:46 +0100 Message-ID: <47AB744E.8070504@keyaccess.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtpq1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl (smtpq1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl [213.51.146.200]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D254245EF for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 22:11:29 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jaroslav Kysela Cc: ALSA development List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 07-02-08 10:37, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > it seems that GIT matured somewhat. git-push has been implemneted. > It was main reason to not use GIT when we made decision between HG and > GIT. > As we could have potential problems with branches in HG > repository, I would like to consider a switch to GIT althought it means > some changes in my scripts on ALSA server and my ksync tool. > I just successfully tried (a bit modified hg-to-git.py script) and > it seems to be working properly. > Any objections? Certainly none from me -- I'd much welcome a native git development environment. Rene.