From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: scsi/arm/fas216.c compile error Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:15:16 +0200 Message-ID: <47AF06F4.2020807@panasas.com> References: <20080209000413.GE6505@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <47AEF6FD.8080801@panasas.com> <20080210135851.GB25703@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080210135851.GB25703@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King Cc: Adrian Bunk , FUJITA Tomonori , James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 10 2008 at 15:58 +0200, Russell King wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> It's in mainline 84ac86ca8c6787f9efff28bc04b1b65fe0a5c310 >> [SCSI] arm: convert to accessors and !use_sg cleanup >> >> Thanks for checking. This patch was in scsi-pending tree since forever, And we were unable >> to get a responsive maintainer to ACK on them. until the breakage cause went into mainline >> we finally managed a Tested-by:. >> >> I guess sometimes people are so busy, you need a bulldozer to shove 20 minutes into they're >> schedule. > > Oh, I was ill for most of December, particularly at the time that you > sent the patch, and by the time I recovered, it was buried in my mailbox. > > Suggest you have some consideration for others who might not be able to > do your beg and call at the immediate moment that you want it, and > consider that their email management skills may not be as l33t as yours. > Dear Russell. You are right. I apologize. I was too trigger happy. I should have resend the request. The patches were in scsi-pending and in -mm. And I assumed it was all good. But it was not accepted into scsi-misc and was somewhat forgotten. I assure you, my email management skills are just as laking as yours. Just that my responsibility's are few. Boaz