From: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: kyle@parisc-linux.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
grundler@parisc-linux.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.alloc_noncoherent = pa11_dma_alloc_consistent?
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:57:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B07E76.9000100@tiscali.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202748349.3122.31.camel@localhost.localdomain>
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 17:23 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
>> duplicate pa11_dma_alloc_consistent; more appropriate appears
>> pa11_dma_alloc_noncoherent here.
>>
>> Not tested, please confirm that this fix is correct
>
> No, it looks completely incorrect to me. What makes you think a pcxl
> box has a problem with coherency?
Ok, please ignore the patch then. It just appeared suspicious to me
that the function did exist, but the names assigned were different.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-11 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-11 16:23 [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.alloc_noncoherent = pa11_dma_alloc_consistent? Roel Kluin
2008-02-11 16:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-02-11 16:45 ` Roel Kluin
2008-02-11 16:55 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-11 16:45 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-11 16:57 ` Roel Kluin [this message]
2008-02-11 17:08 ` [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.alloc_noncoherent John David Anglin
2008-02-11 18:56 ` Roel Kluin
2008-02-11 18:58 ` Kyle McMartin
2008-02-11 19:10 ` [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.alloc_noncoherent = pa11_dma_alloc_consistent? Kyle McMartin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47B07E76.9000100@tiscali.nl \
--to=12o3l@tiscali.nl \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=kyle@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.