From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Gardiner Subject: Re: Best way to specify all local branches and all remote branches. Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:00:37 +0000 Message-ID: <47B0B775.1050401@glidos.net> References: <47B09921.2070109@glidos.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 11 22:01:26 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOfmB-0003Bx-Um for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:01:20 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753438AbYBKVAn (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:00:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753416AbYBKVAn (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:00:43 -0500 Received: from mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.37]:42416 "EHLO mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753111AbYBKVAm (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:00:42 -0500 X-Trace: 38717725/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$MX-ACCEPTED/pipex-infrastructure/62.241.162.31 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 62.241.162.31 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: osronline@glidos.net X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAGpFsEc+8aIf/2dsb2JhbACqHQ X-IP-Direction: IN Received: from galaxy.systems.pipex.net ([62.241.162.31]) by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2008 21:00:40 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.24] (81-86-57-226.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.57.226]) by galaxy.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C845FE000087 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:00:38 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: > >> git-filter-branch is about single branch; > > No. > >> I'm not sure if it should support --all. > > It does. Yep, it does. I'd forgotten how to drive the shell. It works if I put -- --all. Turns out that isn't what I want though. I want just the local branches. Still can't find a way to do it other than my cd/ls thing.