From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
tony.luck@intel.com, anton@samba.org, paulus@samba.org,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [BUID_FAILURE] regression from 2.6.24-git18 to 2.6.25-rc1-git1 on section type conflict psmouse-base
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:17:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B16B16.60402@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080212093614.GF2959@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:59:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:10:02 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This build failure is seen on the powerpc from the 2.6.24-git18 kernel and is still visible
>>> in the 2.6.25-rc1-git1.
>>>
>>> drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c:44: error: __param_proto causes a section type conflict
>>> drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c:44: error: __param_proto causes a section type conflict
>>> make[3]: *** [drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.o] Error 1
>>> make[2]: *** [drivers/input/mouse] Error 2
>>> make[1]: *** [drivers/input] Error 2
>>>
>>> The patch http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/8/514 seems to have not taken into 2.6.25-rc1 and
>>> 2.6.25-rc1-git(s). Is there any new patch i am missing out.
>> I have it queued up, along with quite a few other things, but for the next
>> couple of days I have logistical problems which are preventing me from
>> doing runtime testing.
>
> And this really isn't a regression.
>
> It seems Kamalesh has upgraded his gcc to 4.2 between trying
> 2.6.24-git18 and trying 2.6.25-rc1-git1?
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
Hi Adrian,
I am using the gcc version
gcc (GCC) 4.2.3 20071014 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-3)
It has been the same gcc version from 2.6.24-git18 to 2.6.25-rc1-git{1,2).
This build failure is seen from 2.6.24-git18 and is still seen in 2.6.25-rc1-git{1,2}.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM, ISTL.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-12 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-12 7:40 [BUID_FAILURE] regression from 2.6.24-git18 to 2.6.25-rc1-git1 on section type conflict psmouse-base Kamalesh Babulal
2008-02-12 7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-12 9:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-12 9:47 ` Kamalesh Babulal [this message]
2008-02-12 9:55 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-12 12:10 ` Kamalesh Babulal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47B16B16.60402@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.