All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc1: volanoMark 45% regression
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:15:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B2BC2C.80100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202895028.3027.27.camel@ymzhang>

Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> volanoMark has 45% regression with kernel 2.6.25-rc1 on my both 8-core
> stoakley and 16-core Tigerton.
> 
> I used bisect to locate below patch.
> 
> commit 58e2d4ca581167c2a079f4ee02be2f0bc52e8729
> Author: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date:   Fri Jan 25 21:08:00 2008 +0100
> 
>     sched: group scheduling, change how cpu load is calculated
> 
> 
> 
> hackbench has about 30% regression on 16-core tigerton, but has about 10% improvement
> on 8-core stoakley.
> 
> In addition, tbench has about 6% regression on my 8-core stoakley and
> 25% regression on 16-core stoakley. Some other benchmarks, like netperf/aim7
> also have some regression. I will verify if they are all related to the
> patch.
> 
> -yanmin

Hi, Yamin,

Thanks for reporting the issue? Any chance we could getthe Oprofile output for
the run? The exact commandline and .config being used would also help.

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-13  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-13  9:30 2.6.25-rc1: volanoMark 45% regression Zhang, Yanmin
2008-02-13  9:45 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-02-13 12:07   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-02-14  7:41     ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-02-15  9:25       ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-02-18  4:56         ` Balbir Singh
2008-02-18  5:11           ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-02-18  5:22             ` Balbir Singh
2008-02-18  6:05               ` Zhang, Yanmin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47B2BC2C.80100@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.