From: "A. Nolson" <alohanono@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: V4 FX12 and PLB TEMAC: no space for user logic?
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:33:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B31BCD.9010203@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47B2B94A.6090600@dave-tech.it>
Hi ,
I am now developing my own IPs and when I try to synthesize normally I
get an error because the router finds no place to fit everything. I have
resynthesized using the option:
XIL_PAR_ENABLE_LEGALIZER=1 ( loading the program with that variable on >
XIL_PAR_ENABLE_LEGALIZER=1 xps). It took so much time because it uses a
much more consuming algorithm but I managed to build it correctly.
Regards,
/A
llandre wrote:
> Hi Mohammad,
>
> I've just had a look at the messages you generously posted in the ml
> about your experience with linux on V4 FX12 FPGA.
> I'd like to ask your opinion about FX12 practical usability in this
> context (gigabit PLB TEMAC/linux).
> In this message
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded/16816
>
> you say the device is completely full. If I understand correctly your
> system provides just the devices required to run the bandwidth test so
> it seems there is no room for user logic (I think you did not even add
> the memory controller required to access the NOR Flash containing
> bootloader, kernel image and root fs that is clearly mandatory for
> standalone product). Is that true? If it is, this limits a lot the
> flexibility of this architecture in this configuration. What do you think?
>
>
>
> Regards,
> llandre
>
> DAVE Electronics System House - R&D Department
> web: http://www.dave.eu
> email: r&d2@dave-tech.it
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-13 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-13 9:32 V4 FX12 and PLB TEMAC: no space for user logic? llandre
2008-02-13 16:33 ` A. Nolson [this message]
2008-02-13 21:00 ` Mohammad Sadegh Sadri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47B31BCD.9010203@gmail.com \
--to=alohanono@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.