Re: [git pull] CPU isolation extensions (updated)

[Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Ingo said a few different things (a bit too large to quote). 
> 
> [...]
>> And at the end he said:
>>> Also, i'd not mind some test-coverage in sched.git as well.
> 
>> I far as I know "do not mind" does not mean "must go to" ;-). [...]
> 
> the CPU isolation related patches have typically flown through 
> sched.git/sched-devel.git, so yes, you can take my "i'd not mind" 
> comment as "i'd not mind it at all". That's the tree that all the folks 
> who deal with this (such as Paul) are following. So lets go via the 
> normal contribution cycle and let this trickle through with all the 
> scheduler folks? I'd say 2.6.26 would be a tentative target, if it holds 
> up to scrutiny in sched-devel.git (both testing and review wise). And 
> because Andrew tracks sched-devel.git it will thus show up in -mm too.

Sounds good. Can you pull my tree then ? Or do you want me to resend the patches.
The tree is here:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git
Take the for-linus branch.
Or as I said please let me know and I'll resend the patches.

Thanx
Max