From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763805AbYBNUNj (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:13:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762758AbYBNUN1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:13:27 -0500 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:40562 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761619AbYBNUN0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:13:26 -0500 Message-ID: <47B4A0A4.90404@cs.helsinki.fi> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:12:20 +0200 From: Pekka Enberg User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vegard Nossum CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Daniel Walker , Ingo Molnar , Richard Knutsson , Andi Kleen , Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] kmemcheck v4 References: <47B49DB2.2090402@gmail.com> <47B49E71.4040900@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47B49E71.4040900@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Vegard Nossum wrote: > diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h > index 412672a..7bdb37f 100644 > --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h > +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h > @@ -1294,7 +1294,11 @@ static inline void __skb_queue_purge(struct > sk_buff_head *list) > static inline struct sk_buff *__dev_alloc_skb(unsigned int length, > gfp_t gfp_mask) > { > - struct sk_buff *skb = alloc_skb(length + NET_SKB_PAD, gfp_mask); > + struct sk_buff *skb; > +#ifdef CONFIG_KMEMCHECK > + gfp_mask |= __GFP_ZERO; > +#endif Use __GFP_NOTRACK here (no need to wrap it in CONFIG_KMEMCHECK either). > + skb = alloc_skb(length + NET_SKB_PAD, gfp_mask); > if (likely(skb)) > skb_reserve(skb, NET_SKB_PAD); > return skb; > diff --git a/init/do_mounts.c b/init/do_mounts.c > index f865731..87b1b0f 100644 > --- a/init/do_mounts.c > +++ b/init/do_mounts.c > @@ -201,9 +201,13 @@ static int __init do_mount_root(char *name, char > *fs, int flags, void *data) > return 0; > } > > +#if PAGE_SIZE < PATH_MAX > +# error increase the fs_names allocation size here > +#endif > + > void __init mount_block_root(char *name, int flags) > { > - char *fs_names = __getname(); > + char *fs_names = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, 1); > char *p; > #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK > char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE]; > @@ -251,7 +255,7 @@ retry: > #endif > panic("VFS: Unable to mount root fs on %s", b); > out: > - putname(fs_names); > + free_pages((unsigned long)fs_names, 1); As discussed before, I don't think kmemcheck should be complaining about this (even though this is a potential bug). Have you tried with the current patches to see if it still triggers? Could have been one of the kmemcheck bugs, no? > @@ -255,6 +258,9 @@ struct sk_buff *__netdev_alloc_skb(struct net_device > *dev, > int node = dev->dev.parent ? dev_to_node(dev->dev.parent) : -1; > struct sk_buff *skb; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KMEMCHECK > + gfp_mask |= __GFP_ZERO; > +#endif __GFP_NOTRACK here Pekka