From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] kmemcheck v4
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:18:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B4A208.7040407@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47B49E39.7070904@gmail.com>
Vegard Nossum wrote:
> From 4ce1c09e38b2402dc04f0246916f3c23abe8f3e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:25:39 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make SLUB use kmemcheck
>
> With kmemcheck enabled, SLUB needs to do this:
>
> 1. Request twice as much memory as would normally be needed. The bottom
> half
> of the memory is what the user actually sees and uses; the upper half
> contains the so-called shadow memory, which stores the status of each
> byte
> in the bottom half, e.g. initialized or uninitialized.
> 2. Tell kmemcheck which parts of memory that should be marked
> uninitialized.
> There are actually a few more states, such as "not yet allocated" and
> "recently freed".
>
> If a slab cache is set up using the SLAB_NOTRACK flag, it will never return
> memory that can take page faults because of kmemcheck.
>
> If a slab cache is NOT set up using the SLAB_NOTRACK flag, callers can
> still
> request memory with the __GFP_NOTRACK flag. This does not prevent the page
> faults from occuring, however, but marks the object in question as being
> initialized so that no warnings will ever be produced for this object.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-14 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-14 19:59 [PATCH 1/4] kmemcheck v4 Vegard Nossum
2008-02-14 20:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] " Vegard Nossum
2008-02-14 20:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] " Vegard Nossum
2008-02-14 20:18 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2008-02-14 20:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] " Vegard Nossum
2008-02-14 20:12 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-02-14 20:31 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-02-14 21:49 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-15 19:18 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-02-14 20:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] " Pekka Enberg
2008-02-14 21:05 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47B4A208.7040407@cs.helsinki.fi \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ricknu-0@student.ltu.se \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.