From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [216.145.245.199] (helo=mx03.dls.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ263-00035x-8e for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:03:29 +0100 Received: from gw.mwester.net ([209.242.5.110] helo=[192.168.1.111]) by mx03.dls.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ25k-0007Zq-69 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:03:08 -0600 Message-ID: <47B5A9A4.3040400@dls.net> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:03:00 -0600 From: "Mike (mwester)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <74d0deb30802140817g153c4fe3if16cd9eabe67c9f3@mail.gmail.com> <200802151245.30040.mickey@vanille-media.de> In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.145.245.199 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mwester@dls.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [oe-commits] org.oe.dev anki: fix parse error X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:03:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rolf Leggewie wrote: > Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > >> export PV is valid syntax, but needs bitbake >= 1.8.8. >> >> If you think it's too early to depend on this, then you can substitute with >> >> export PV := "${PV}" >> > > I think depending on 1.8.10 is fine and indeed, this might be a good > test to make sure everybody updates ;-) > > I recall a series of discussions some months ago regarding the topic of making OE an easier tool for other distro developers, companies, or individuals to use. Requiring a bitbake upgrade to accommodate a single-line in a single recipe that can easily be expressed in a fashion compatible with the existing bitbake versions installed, well that just seem to fly in the face of that earlier discussion. Here's one vote for against forcing a complete bitbake upgrade on other communities: -1 from me! > Thanks for clarifying why some people saw this while most did not. > > Mike (mwester)