From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JQlXi-0004bO-01 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:35:06 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2008 15:34:22 -0000 Received: from e178090193.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO [192.168.4.101]) [85.178.90.193] by mail.gmx.net (mp022) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2008 16:34:22 +0100 X-Authenticated: #17532834 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18M5X54dRIMvVlrucdELC9ZLblC1dwh+Xs/WCO2w5 oP2YCBnvkBi0Xk Message-ID: <47B853FA.5060206@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:34:18 +0100 From: Robert Schuster User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 213.165.64.20 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: theBohemian@gmx.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] push those patches, push'em up X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:35:16 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 4187 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDCB40929EAFE90A10FADBA5D" --------------enigDCB40929EAFE90A10FADBA5D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, while I like the idea I wonder what we do with patches taken from other famous distributions. E.g. I like apt-get source to see which flaws the Debianistas already found and worked-around/fixed and often just include their patches into OE. Since the Debian team is often interested to get their patches merged upstream, that means less work for us. :) Regards Robert Rolf Leggewie schrieb: > Hi, >=20 > OE has quite many patches that are just too valuable to keep to > ourselves. In the spirit of our bug sprint weekends, I want to propose= > patch-pushing weekends. Maybe we can even replace the former with the > latter. I'd like to propose the coming weekend as the first of this ki= nd. > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >=20 --------------enigDCB40929EAFE90A10FADBA5D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHuFP9G9cfwmwwEtoRCO8XAKCWXt47bA46lTvhHG7lwKYfWwK3NwCghClH bClnx2e8v/txnLQztTJRf7A= =F0TE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDCB40929EAFE90A10FADBA5D--